Inventory
List current URLs, navigation, content, assets, forms, integrations, analytics, domain access, hosting access, and source ownership.
US decision guide / Redesign
Redesign when the current structure and technical foundation can support the next offer. Rebuild when navigation, templates, code, access, or ownership limits make meaningful changes harder than replacing the foundation. Audit the current website before choosing either route.
Last reviewed: · Reviewed by Kacper Rękawek, founder
01 / Decision table
The label should follow evidence from the current website, not a preference for a particular platform or visual style.
| Area | Evidence for redesign | Evidence for rebuild |
|---|---|---|
| Offer and content | The core information is accurate and can be reorganized. | The website is built around an offer or audience the business no longer serves. |
| Navigation and templates | The structure can support the required pages and next actions. | The existing structure forces confusing navigation, duplicated pages, or fragile layouts. |
| Code and platform | The foundation is maintainable and supports the approved scope. | Required changes depend on workarounds or inaccessible, obsolete, or unowned code. |
| Access and ownership | The business controls its domain, hosting, source, and required accounts. | Missing access or unclear ownership prevents a responsible update and handoff. |
| Migration and SEO | Most useful URLs and page purposes can stay stable. | New structure requires URL mapping, redirects, metadata review, and a controlled migration. |
02 / Warning signs
A website can look dated and still have a sound foundation. A newer website can still block inquiries, ownership, or search migration.
03 / Audit
An audit does not need an invented score. It needs a complete record of what exists, what matters, what is missing, and what the new scope requires.
List current URLs, navigation, content, assets, forms, integrations, analytics, domain access, hosting access, and source ownership.
Identify useful page intent, content, URLs, brand assets, and operational connections that should survive the change.
Separate content, visual, structural, and technical changes, then choose redesign, selective rebuild, or full rebuild.
Define checks for navigation, forms, mobile behavior, accessibility, metadata, canonicals, redirects, analytics, and the sitemap.
04 / Migration and SEO
A rebuild can change the technical foundation without discarding useful search context. The migration plan should be written before launch, then verified against the deployed website.
05 / FAQ
These answers define a decision process without inventing timelines, rankings, results, or a universal redesign price.
A redesign improves the visible experience while keeping enough of the current foundation. A rebuild replaces structural or technical parts that cannot support the required change. The right choice depends on current code, content, ownership, integrations, URLs, and the approved scope.
Existing copy, brand assets, photography, and product knowledge can be reused when they remain accurate and available for the approved brief. An audit should label what stays, what needs revision, and what is missing before the project scope is confirmed.
Not necessarily. Useful URLs should remain stable when the page purpose and structure still fit. When a URL must change, the migration plan should map the old address to the correct new destination and update internal links, canonicals, and the sitemap.
A redesign should inventory search-critical pages before changes, preserve useful page intent and content, plan redirects for changed URLs, review metadata and canonicals, and validate internal links and the sitemap. FastLanding does not promise rankings or invented traffic results.
A practical audit should cover current URLs, navigation, content, brand assets, forms, integrations, analytics, domain and hosting access, source ownership, mobile behavior, accessibility, and technical SEO. The audit should separate facts, risks, missing access, and optional improvements.
Yes, when the current platform, code, access, and ownership can support the approved scope without fragile workarounds. When the foundation blocks required changes or cannot be maintained responsibly, rebuilding selected parts or the whole website can be the clearer decision.
FastLanding's published US launch price is $3,900 for one defined website sprint. A redesign or rebuild label alone does not set the price; the written scope and dependencies do.
There is no universal timeline on this page. Timing depends on the approved scope, available materials, migration requirements, integrations, and review pace. FastLanding states the start window and milestones in the written proposal instead of publishing an unsupported deadline.
Project fit
Share the URL, offer, audience, known problems, required integrations, available assets, and what must remain under your control.